Catholic and Anglican Prisons bishops support bill amendment on hidden ‘devastating consequences’ for children when primary caregivers are imprisoned

Published: Thursday March 7, 2024

Bishop Richard Moth, the Lead Bishop for Prisons for the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, and Bishop Rachel Treweek, Anglican Bishop for Prisons, have issued a joint statement supporting Amendment 172 to the Victims and Prisoners Bill.

The amendment to the Bill, currently at the Committee Stage in the House of Lords, requires the central collection and publication of data that shows the number of primary carers in the prison system, how many children they are responsible for, as well as the ages of those children.

According to the two bishops, this will help society understand the “devastating consequences” that the imprisonment of a primary caregiver can have on a child.

The amendment will help understand and address the experience of the over 17,500 children estimated to be separated from their mothers in prison

They said:

“Given the absence of any systematic recording and reporting of the number of children affected by imprisonment and the compelling evidence that the imprisonment of a primary carer can have devastating consequences for the development of a child, we believe that such an amendment is both necessary and proportionate to inform our criminal justice policy in an area of great and growing social concern.”

The amendment, tabled by Lord Farmer with support from Bishop Treweek and Labour Peer Lord Ponsonby, will help understand and address the experience of the over 17,500 children estimated to be separated from their mothers in prison, as well as those without other primary caregivers.

Bishop Moth and Bishop Treweek agreed:

“Substantial research has revealed that children affected by the imprisonment of a primary carer are hidden victims of the criminal justice process, especially in the most common cases where their mother has been sent to prison.

“When we consider that 31% of our female prisoners and 24% of our male prisoners were themselves taken into care as children, we can see that caring for children, especially those affected by imprisonment, is critical for the flourishing of all within our communities.”

“A mother’s imprisonment is often a profoundly disruptive and traumatic experience affecting all aspects of a child’s life, regardless of the age of the child or the length of the sentence, while the rupturing of relationship between a prisoner with primary caring responsibilities and those in their care can itself be a significant stumbling block to rehabilitation.”

They added:

“When we consider that 31% of our female prisoners and 24% of our male prisoners were themselves taken into care as children, we can see that caring for children, especially those affected by imprisonment, is critical for the flourishing of all within our communities.”

The full statement is below:

Joint statement by Rt Rev Richard Moth, Bishop of Arundel and Brighton and Catholic Liaison Bishop for Prisons, and Rt Rev Rachel Treweek, Bishop of Gloucester and Anglican Bishop for Prisons, in support of amendment 172 to the Victims and Prisoners Bill

We would like to express our shared strong support for an amendment to the Victims and Prisoners Bill, currently at Committee Stage in the House of Lords, that seeks to better understand and address the complex needs of children affected by the imprisonment of their primary carers.

Laid by Lord Farmer with support from the Bishop of Gloucester and Labour Peer Lord Ponsonby, amendment 172 would require the central collection and publication of data identifying the number of primary carers in prison and the number and age of their children. Given the absence of any systematic recording and reporting of the number of children affected by imprisonment and the compelling evidence that the imprisonment of a primary carer can have devastating consequences for the development of a child, we believe that such an amendment is both necessary and proportionate to inform our criminal justice policy in an area of great and growing social concern.

As Christians, we share a common calling to care for all those affected by crime and punishment, including those who have been victimised. Substantial research has revealed that children affected by the imprisonment of a primary carer are hidden victims of the criminal justice process, especially in the most common cases where their mother has been sent to prison. A mother’s imprisonment is often a profoundly disruptive and traumatic experience affecting all aspects of a child’s life, regardless of the age of the child or the length of the sentence, while the rupturing of relationship between a prisoner with primary caring responsibilities and those in their care can itself be a significant stumbling block to rehabilitation. Although voluntary organisations, such as the Prison Advice & Care Trust, do much valuable work in maintaining healthy connections between prisoners and their families, the scope and scale of the challenge of parental, particularly maternal, imprisonment surely requires a much greater response.

Although the catastrophic impact of maternal imprisonment on children and the importance of family relationships in reducing reoffending have previously been highlighted by the Corston Report and the Farmer Review, there are still more than 17,500 children estimated to be separated from their mothers in prison. By gathering more accurate information on the number of children in such cases, we can better inform an integrated approach across Government, HMPPS, local authorities and voluntary organisations to address the complex needs of such children and their imprisoned primary carers whose voices have been unheeded for too long.

In the midst of his public ministry, Christ reminded us to “let the little children come to me and do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:14). The inherent dignity of children and their need for care in vulnerable situations is paramount to Christian teaching and underpins our support for this amendment. When we consider that 31% of our female prisoners and 24% of our male prisoners were themselves taken into care as children, we can see that caring for children, especially those affected by imprisonment, is critical for the flourishing of all within our communities.

 

 

Take it further:

Bishop Rachel’s role as Anglican Bishop for Prisons
Read more on the ongoing Sentencing campaign
Fighting for Women’s justice

2 thoughts on “Catholic and Anglican Prisons bishops support bill amendment on hidden ‘devastating consequences’ for children when primary caregivers are imprisoned

  1. I am so pleased to see that this is being addressed. Children should not be separated from their mothers unless that situation is dangerous. This causes irreversible damage to both the mother and the child. Being taken away from your children is the worst form of punishment there is, and something you never recover from.
    I started a 2 year sentence 2 days before my youngest son’s 16th birthday, we have both suffered as have my other 2 adult sons. My youngest sat his GCSE’s 2 weeks after I left, I should have been there to support him. My worst day in prison was the day of his prom when another mum was ironing his shirt for him. I will never stop feeling guilty for leaving him, I have been home for a year almost and it’s still very raw now. I wasn’t a danger to anyone and have a very low risk of reoffending. I gained nothing from prison except for worsened mental health. What was the point of putting my family through 2 years of hell? There must be an alternative, I fully accept that I did wrong but a community sentence would have been far more useful to society and not punished my family.
    This is an issue that I feel very strongly about and would be willing to help in any way that I can. I met Bishop Rachel while I was in HMP Eastwood Park and have so much respect for the work she does. Thank you to you all.

    1. I totally agree Claire. I have no experience of your situation but have felt for a long time that in situations where someone is of no harm to society, unless it’s a case of repeated offending despite community service, it causes more harm ultimately to society than good when there are children involved.

Leave a Reply

Most popular articles today: